Latest

An idol called the 'church' part 8

In this article we will discover the answer to two important questions.

What is the House of God?

Where is the House of God?

A sign outside a ‘church’ read “If you come to my house, I will come to yours”

While this simple statement may appear good it isn’t scriptural or doctrinally correct at all. It paints a picture that is incorrect. I will explain later.

Some have criticized me saying I am ‘picky’ or ‘playing on words’. Many excuses for not dealing with the idol have been made saying things like “does it really matter” or, “they don’t really mean what they say”. (when I use examples of statements people say).

Maybe the individual, incorrect statement in itself may seem insignificant (like “If you come to my house, I will come to yours”) The problem is the number of small incorrect statements combined paint a huge picture that people see, and that is how the idol seeps into our thinking, little by little. It then takes revelation to break through that mindset.

2 Cor 10:3-5 states how to do this.

You see a power (idol) manifests through strongholds, arguments, speculations, imaginations, every high thing that exults itself above the knowledge of God, even thoughts that are not taken captive to the obedience of Christ.

A thought – A series of thoughts is an idea.
A series of ideas put together you have a concept.
Several concepts, now you have an argument (something you can have an argument about). Arguments together you have a stronghold or an ideology or a culture, a worldview. You may not have a visible idol but you have ideology or culture & so spiritual powers manifest through ideas that keep people from truth.

The powers manifest through man – through ideas, culture, a way to see things, a way to do things.

This statement (“If you come to my house, I will come to yours”) as well as others bandied about by well-meaning people are influenced by the idol to enforce its effect in people’s lives. The idol seeks to enslave people to serve it, rather than serve Christ.

Example: how often do you hear statements like:-

“Welcome to the house of God today”

“We are building the house of God”

“We are taking up an offering to build the house”

“God is in the house this morning”

I have heard whole series of sermons on “We are sons of the house” and “We are to serve the house”

I hear these statements and actually cringe. Why?

Well first what is the house of God?

In the Old Testament both the temple in the wilderness and Solomon's temple were filled with the Spirit of God, to the extent that the priests could not even stand to minister.

In the Old Testament God actually dwelled in the temples made by men.

There are countless scriptures that talk about God dwelling in man-made structures. This was very important for people of that era as a temple was far more than an expensive and beautiful place to worship:
a temple was the place where the God they worshiped lived.

The first mention of the house of God in scripture is where Jacob experienced the manifest presence of God and thus said “this is none other than the house of God” Gen 28:17. The house of God literally became where God’s presence was.

Right from the beginning God wanted to dwell with His people. After the fall God instructed Moses to build a tabernacle for His presence to dwell. Exo 25:8

It was an incredible thing; the people of God seeing God descend into the tabernacle.
Ex 33:8-11 where Moses spoke with God face to face. Where Joshua ministered to the Lord.

Worship was given because God was there.

The writer of Hebrews, in chapter 9, describes the Old Testament temple; its appearance and the activities of the Levite priests (vs. 1-8). He then compares it to the temple of Christ as follows:

But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things to come,
He entered through the greater and more perfect tabernacle [or sacred tent] not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building (Hebrews 9:11).

In the New Testament, under the new covenant instituted by Christ,


God no longer dwells in a physical temple.

Acts 7:47-50 But Solomon built him an house. Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest? Hath not my hand made all these things?

Again Paul said in

Acts 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

A building is not the habitation of God anymore.

There are only 3 references to the term ‘house of God’ in some translations of the NT. (Other translations translate the Greek word oikos ‘houshold’ All three of them referring to the spiritual household of God which is the assembly. We must view these scriptures in light of all other NT scriptures which refer to the body as the house of God (1 Pet 2:5) Not a building or organization.

1 Timothy 3:15, Hebrews 10:21 & 1 Peter 4:17

Paul never refers to the Ekklesia (assembly) as a physical structure but as a dedicated group of disciples; a new race redeemed by the blood of Christ (Mounce's Expository Dictionary).

"And coming to Him as to a living stone which has been rejected by men, but is choice [chosen, elect] and precious in the sight of God, you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices 1 Peter 2:4-5

All
sources agree that ‘ekklesia’ denotes not a physical structure but a living, eternal spiritual dwelling place.

Paul said:
"So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints [holy ones] and are of God's household,

having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone, in whom the whole building, being fitted together, is growing
into a holy temple [sanctuary] in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit" (Ephesians 2:20-22).

The true assembly of believers of God is not of this world but is a spiritual dwelling place for God.

So the church building is no longer inhabited by God – it is not the house of God anymore, it is not sacred, it is not holy, it is not sanctified.

But the body of Christ is now being built up as a dwelling place of God, the body of Christ is now the temple, and individuals are of the household of God.

His house will be (is) within His believers. We of the Body of Christ are His dwelling place forever.

Hebrews 3:6 but Christ, as Son over his house, whose house are we, if indeed we hold fast the boldness and the boast of hope firm to the end.

1 Corinthians 3:16-17 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

2 Corinthians 5:1 For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.

Now, here is the clincher

2 Corinthians 6:16
What agreement has a temple of God with idols? For you are a temple of the living God. Even as God said, "I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they will be my people."

What agreement has a temple of God with idols? None. Repent and turn away from idols, repent
and turn away from the idol called the church to Christ.

I am not saying turn away from assembling together as the assembly of believers in Christ, I am not even saying do away with buildings in which we meet
but I am saying turn away from the idol called the church.

The glory doesn’t reside anymore in the building or organization.


Where God’s glory resides:-

From the temple (OT) to Christ & the body of Christ (NT)

We are told that Jesus is the Chief Cornerstone. Jesus is the Chief cornerstone of the spiritual building of God.

Matt. 16:15-18  He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? 16  And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. 17  And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. 18  And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my assembly; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

This passage has given rise to many different interpretations. Some have supposed that the word ROCK refers to Peter himself. This, I believe, is not correct because the assembly Christ is talking about building is not built upon a man but rather it is a spiritual building. We see the idol’s philosophy here - when man is made the centre of anything. (you could study the Catholic church’s doctrine of Peter being the rock & foundation of the church)

Jesus is the foundation and the rock – Not Peter

Others have supposed that the assembly will be built upon Peter’s confession; and that he meant to say, upon this rock-- this truth that thou hast confessed, that I am the Messiah--and upon confessions of this from all believers, I will build my assembly.

Others have thought that Jesus referred to himself.

Christ is called a rock, Isa 28:16; Eph 2:20

1 Peter 2:5-9 You also, as living stones, are built up as a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. Because it is contained in Scripture, "Behold, I lay in Zion a chief cornerstone, chosen, and precious: He who believes in him will not be disappointed." For you therefore who believe is the honor, but for such as are disobedient, "The stone which the builders rejected, Has become the chief cornerstone," and, "A stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense." For they stumble at the word, being disobedient, whereunto also they were appointed. But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession, that you may show forth the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light:

I believe the later to be what Jesus was referring to. He being the chief cornerstone and the ‘lively stones’ (believers) being built up as a spiritual house where the presence of God dwells.

This is the assembly that He is building. The word assembly could be understood like the assembling of a jigsaw puzzle rather than just a group of people meeting together. Another way of looking at the word is like a car assembly line where cars are being assembled.

Jesus said “I will build my assembly” the house of God is being assembled, (built, put together) with Christ being the cornerstone.

These other passages make clear that Jesus Himself is the foundation. The chief cornerstone was the foundational stone in ancient architecture, from which all measurements began, so every other stone was laid in relationship to the cornerstone. Clearly this position belongs to Jesus.

Jesus being the foundation stone, all other stones should be laid by Him & directly from Him.

In other words if you want to see what the assembly should look like, look at the cornerstone.


Look at Jesus the ‘fundamental beginning’ to see what He is building now. What did Jesus do, how did He do it. If what is being built is not the image of Christ then its probably not Christ.

Jesus said "I will build my assembly" & the book of Acts shows Him doing it.

J.B. Phillips wrote that the reader of the book of Acts "is seeing Christianity, the real thing, in action for the first time in human history .... as it was meant to be."

Many have been saying for years “we need to return to the Book of Acts Christianity.” (Christianity as portrayed by the early saints) Many have been saying “we need to build our ‘churches’ by the pattern of the Book of Acts.”

I agree, but we can’t do it while keeping the old. We cannot stay in the ‘system’ and try and change it. I have been in ministry around 30 years and I have never seen it done. People have said things like “well I am just staying and praying that things will change” – Experience shows - they don’t.

You cannot put new wine in old wineskins. You cannot patch old cloth with new cloth.

It is not developing a new ‘system’ within the ‘system’ to overcome the idol.

I believe it is all about looking to Jesus and seeing what He is assembling. Many are, I am amazed at what God is doing, there is a spiritual reformation going on. People are getting revelation, connections of parts of the body coming together in unique ways.

‘Churches’ are being transformed. I know a number that are transitioning well, some started but have slowed for various reasons and some started but have stopped because it’s too hard. Needless to say there is a shift going on.

One in particular in NZ has had an awesome transition from a church to an Assembly – they have forsook the idol and the old ways and simply sought Christ to live His way. It has sometimes been a hard road for them, many not understanding them, but they are flying high in Jesus, seeing people’s lives change by teaching them how to ‘be’ Christians and flow in the power of the Holy Spirit instead of being pew warmers and learning how to get a good life style. While some think they are ‘off the planet’ others think they have given up far too much. I believe their response is that what they have now as an assembly far outweighs any cost of transition.

We are looking at joining with and setting up something to help others on a similar journey, not a network as such but a group of likeminded people on the same page helping, resources, encouraging one another etc.

While this is in its infancy, If you are interested please email me and I can let you know more as things become clear.


In Him we live and move and have our being. Acts 17:28

 

An idol called the 'church' part 7

Last time we looked at ‘is church planting scriptural’ – we finished off with a bunch of scriptures that proponents of church planting use to ‘prove’ this is what we all should be doing.

Taken from a church planting manual.

Why plant churches

JESUS TOLD US TO DO IT.
Matt. 28:19,20. “Go therefore and make disciples....baptising them...teaching
them to observe all things I have commanded....”

We cannot effectively make disciples and teach them the commands of Christ
outside a church setting.


An evangelistic campaign declares the gospel. It brings people to a place of
decision but it doesn't fully teach them all the things that Jesus commanded
us. This can only be done in a church setting.

When properly understood we see that the Great Commission is specifically a
commission about Church Planting.


2. THE EARLY CHURCH SET THE PRECEDENT.
Throughout the book of Acts, we see that whenever the disciples went about
fulfilling the Great Commission, they planted churches.

Illustrations
i) Acts 8:5-12 Philip plants a church in Samaria.
ii) Acts 9:1-2,19 Believers had planted a church in Damascus.
iii) Acts 9:31 By now there were churches throughout all Judea, Galilee and
Samaria.
iv) Acts 9:32-35 A church was planted in Lydda.
v)Acts 10:24-48 Peter established a Gentile church in Caesarea.
vi) Acts 11:19-26 The persecuted believers planted churches in Phoenicia,
Cyprus and Antioch.
vii) Acts 13:2 - 14:28 Paul's first missionary journey - the biggest single
church planting venture up to that point.
viii) Acts 15:40 - 18:23 Paul's second missionary journey - all to do with
church planting and strengthening existing churches.
ix) Acts 18:24 - 21:25 Paul's third missionary journey - again he planted new
churches and strengthened established ones.
(a full transcript of this whole course on church planting [taken from a church planting movements website] can be requested by replying to this email)

We can see from these scriptures used to promote church planting that unless you have a ‘church planting’ mindset or a presupposition towards ‘church planting’ that they have nothing to do with church planting.

The great commission of Jesus has nothing to do with planting / building churches - but everything to do with building people.

The highlighted comments are not only misinterpreting scripture but are statements of error.

It is called heresy when you assume and teach scripture to be saying something it is not. While I have been wrongfully accused of heresy myself for exposing the idol called the church, the proponents of church planting continue to promote such huge assumptions of scripture – which is indeed heresy and is welcomed by the majority of western church leaders who seem to be blindly bent on finding programs to bring ‘success’ to their ministry, it seems at any cost – even misrepresenting scripture.

I can say this because this is exactly what I did for years along with thousands of others caught in the trap of performance, trying to find success and significance in a system that doesn’t deliver (because its an idol). I believe this is why so many pastors and leaders burn out, some have even committed suicide – surely if this ‘system’ was of God there would not be the huge rate of burnout. The system is set up for failure - that is why thousands of ministers leave the ministry every month, feeling like a failure. If you are serving the idol you will fail. Not failing God, but failing the unattainable expectations the idol puts on you.

I know of a Pastor of a very large church, very successful in the eyes of his peers, commit suicide because of the pressure to perform. Yet on the other hand, another pastor who confided in me and basically said “I have never felt so free and fulfilled since I got off the treadmill of trying to be successful in the system”, his peers would say he was a failure yet he has seen more fruit of souls being saved and baptised since he was freed from the idol he served.

Almost every Christian is taught an absolute basic rule of interpreting scripture – ‘never assume’.

In this instance, assuming Jesus meant the great commission was all about planting churches, we see the great commission turned into an industry of churning out ‘clones’ of the idol.

The assumption, in effect, causes the great commission to be denigrated to building church organizations, instead of building people. While some would argue that churches build or look after people, if you go back to what ekklesia means, (assembly) it is people, the assembly, that builds people – people serving people, not organized systems and programs seeking to help people.

In fact in many places it is people serving the vision of the church rather than an assembly serving others.

It in many cases, is people serving leaders instead of leaders serving people. The word Minister actually means servant.

Simply - its either people serving the church or - an ekklesia (assembly) serving people.

This church planting ‘industry’ is worth millions of dollars in books explaining the whole ethos of church planting and with speakers promoting it to leaders and people that are blinded by the idol.

Churches and whole movements invest a countless amount of hours and money into learning how to plant or how to grow churches, because it is the ‘in thing’ to do, without realizing they are being taught the ways of the idol.

You cannot grow an organism with organizational principles. A body cannot be built by business strategies.

But when you concentrate on building the body of Christ, the ekklesia, instead of building an  ‘organization’ the body grows into an incredible ‘organism’ – instead of a ‘business’ you get a ‘body’.

The great commission is all about the body moving in divine power establishing disciples. To say this is not possible outside of a church setting is absolutely ludicrous. It is the body (people) doing the ‘work of the ministry’ that fulfils the commission, not setting up church programs or structure. The idol called the church has taken the place of the body. It has taken the power away from the body.

Many leaders complain of the lack of response from people in their ‘churches’ – complaining that people just don’t want to get involved. Maybe if those leaders trained people to ‘be’ the body (instead of spectators on a Sunday) and release them to fulfil ‘their’ call and gifting instead of training people to fulfil the church’s vision, the body would rise up in new found zeal and power.

Maybe if people were encouraged to move in the Spirit, to use the gifts out in the market place instead of the four walls of a church building on a Sunday morning, to share the goodness of Jesus, His love and saving power to people instead of trying to get them to join their club (church), maybe, just maybe, we would see the revival of souls that we see in many nations where the organizational church is not in control. Where people are walking in the Spirit, being led by the Spirit, into situations that He wants to minister into.

Oh to see the body, as an organism, walking in divine power. An organism multiplies by itself, it can be contagious, infectious even. My desire is to see the body released into what the Lord has for it, not being shackled by religious routines and man made methods.

I have said for many years that I believe the coming revival that many talk about is about people – its not about a church, a city or a ministry – its about the body of Christ rising globally in the power of Christ to do the works of Christ.

It is a revival of the body of Christ, to be the body of Christ.

A revival which sees the uncontained impact of the Kingdom flow from person to person, from town to town and from nation to nation – an unstoppable force that many leaders dream of but will never attain by learning the ways of or serving the idol.

I understand now that my part in all this revelation is to train and release the body into their God given call. Eph 4:12 for the perfecting of the saints, to the work of serving, to the building up of the body of Christ;

A few years ago we started off conducting schools of the Spirit in many places – with many different topics or themes, instructing people how to flow in the Spirit instead of being bound by Greek philosophical mindsets. Many testified of seeing the power of Christ manifest outside the four walls of church, as they stood in faith to heal the sick, or get a word from God for an unsaved person. The course of whole assemblies changed direction and they are now journeying into uncharted waters, some plunging into the deep end, others finding the transition difficult.

Jeannette & I are committed to continue to help anyone transition from the bondage of the idol to freedom in Christ. We will continue to conduct the schools of the Spirit anywhere the Lord specifies.

We have also had the privilege of helping leaders to become ‘presence based’ instead of ‘performance based’ and will continue to do this as the Lord leads.

It would be so easy to fall back into the system ourselves, doing religious routines that we have been taught for so many years, but we are determined to push into those uncharted waters ourselves and are desperately wanting to be led of the Holy Spirit so much more and to help others do so –

Your comments are appreciated.
 

An idol called the 'church' part 6

Part 6 – Is ‘church’ planting scriptural

Before we get to this teaching:-

I have been discussing an idol called the church. Sometimes I feel I am like a flea trying to bring down an Elephant. That the idol is too big, it has been around for centuries and who am I to tackle it. I am encouraged by those that are doing likewise and those who are seeing the idol for what it is and seeking to get from under its deceptive power and alas I am saddened by some of my ‘friends in ministry’ that have vehemently opposed me and actively sided with the idol they serve.

I could have used the term ‘an idol called religion’ and few would have objected because they don’t consider themselves ‘religious’– the religious ones are of course ‘everyone else’. (Religious in the negative sense of the word). I could have used the term ‘an idol called Catholicism’ and everyone outside the Catholic church* would say Amen.

*It was in fact the Catholic church that first began using the word ‘church’ for a Christian gathering place or Christian organization. The Catholic bible was written in Latin and is where we find the word ‘church’ used in context to a Christian meeting place. This is why we cant find the equivalent word for ‘church’  in the Greek as it was a term adopted into the Latin catholic bible. Incidentally the reformers, including Luther, were opposed basically to the organizational structure and error of the institution called the ‘church’.

But because the term ‘an idol called the church’ hits at the very roots of what we have been taught to believe, it becomes personal. Because it is personal we can’t fob it off onto someone else, we then have to deal with it ourselves. How we deal with it determines what happens in our lives. The choices are clear.

1/ dismiss it without even seeking God as to its truth
2/ seek God about it, pray and study the word.
3/ change

Many have said the term communicates what they have been feeling. Many others have expressed the term in different ways over the years, even as I am learning more, over hundreds of years.

Some are having difficulty understanding the concept because of the old ingrained mindset which continues to cloud the truth.

I need to stress some points, again.

1/ I am not against the body of Christ which is commonly called ‘the church’ – I love the body of Christ and want to serve wherever I can.
2/ I am not against the body of Christ assembling together to worship God in buildings. I love being part of corporate gatherings of worshipers.
3/  But I am against this idol that masquerades as ‘the Church’ – it looks like ‘the church’ but it isn’t. It is very deceptive; it makes people believe in it in so many ways. People vehemently protect it. Many don’t have a true relationship with God because of it. It is treated and acts in the place of God in so many ways. (I have mentioned some and will be continuing revealing more aspects of this idol as time goes by)

I believe one of the most subtle deceptions the idol uses to protect itself is the word ‘church’ itself. I have taught where we got the word from, its original meaning and the correct use of the Greek word Ekklesia (that it doesn’t mean church, never has).

Some statements that may help. We don’t ‘go’ to church. We don’t ‘have’ church. We don’t ‘attend’ church. We are not ‘in’ church or ‘out’ of church. We don’t ‘belong’ to a church.

We ‘ARE’ the church. (old terminology) - We ‘ARE’ the assembly of the firstborn.

I have suggested that because of the history and the meaning of the word church, because of the error it represents and the confusion it brings that we simply stop using the word.

While it seems to be a very simple suggestion it has been met with different reactions like “you are just word playing” or “does it really matter what we call it” or even spiritualized comments like “the Lord knows what I mean when I say church”. What these comments actually do is dismiss the whole revelation about the idol instead of engaging it.

What do people mean when they say things like “I love Jesus and I am still going to go to church like I always have done”. Well they are actually dismissing the Love of Jesus from delivering them from the power of the idol. When people don’t want to change they pre-empt their statements with things like “I love Jesus” or “Jesus knows my heart” or “Jesus knows what I mean”.

Is ‘church’ planting scriptural

Is church planting in the Bible? Have you ever researched this without a church planting mindset? Did Jesus say “go and plant churches”? We have attributed the Apostle Paul as the greatest ‘church planter’ – did he actually plant churches? If not what did he actually do? We attribute the gift of Apostle to church planting. Did the Apostles plant churches? If our mindset of church planting is incorrect what do we do to get back to the commission of Jesus?

I have planted numerous churches over around 30 years of ministry, I have trained people to plant churches, I have been involved in a senior leadership role of a church planting movement. When the Lord spoke to me and said “Church planting isn’t in the Bible” I was shocked but then soon realized there are actually no scriptures that talk about church planting.

The great commission is to “go into all the world and make disciples” – not plant churches.

Matt 28:19-20, Mark 16:15-18, Matt 10: etc

There is NO command, NO scripture where Jesus said to go plant churches rather go preach the gospel in the power of the Holy Spirit. It is the body of Christ’s commission to proclaim the gospel and make disciples. As we do this He said I will build my assembly.

It is very simple, if we plant churches the emphasis is on the church. If we proclaim the gospel the emphasis is all about Jesus and people.

If the emphasis is planting a church its all about how we go about this – what musicians do we have, what leaders do we need, what Sunday school class is needed, the building, the advertising, the signs etc. We put an advert in the paper or door knock to let everyone know a new church is in town. What sort of ‘programs’ will we use to attract people. How are we going to be ‘relevant’ to our community? There are many, many programs available from the ‘church’ that successfully used a program that ‘grew’ their church.

We attend church growth seminars, seminars on how to break through to the next level (of the membership role), we do everything we can and strive to get our church filled with bums on seats. We get to 500 members and now we can attend the 500 club to learn how to get to the next level. Church planting in the west is all about the organization, the success of numbers, how well we perform and the achievement of ‘building a church’.

Conversely Jesus said go preach about the Kingdom (not preach how to get a better lifestyle) – make disciples – I will give you power to heal the sick, cast out demon’s – I will validate what you says by signs following. In scripture, the result of this is that those that got saved assembled together for prayer, worship and fellowship. The intent was for people to be saved and delivered from bondage not sign up for church membership.

Have a church planting mindset - the emphasis is on the church.

Have a gospel mindset – the emphasis on people.

You say well the church helps people in lots of ways – yes, so do hundreds of other humanistic organizations helping people in their need while Jesus delivers people out of their bondage.

I am coming from a ‘Pentecostal’ standpoint here (I got saved in a Pentecostal assembly and have ministered mostly in that stream) – let me ask you when was the last time you saw someone delivered from demons in ‘church’. When was the last time you saw a miracle, healing, sign or wonder done in ‘church’. When was the last time you saw someone truly repent and get converted in ‘church’ (not just say a little prayer). 

The answer for many, sadly, is many years ago. Why, because the idol has infiltrated the Pentecostal assemblies and shut the power of the gospel down. It has become more about the idol than the gospel of Jesus.

For most churches the program goes like this – 3 fast songs, 3 slow songs, 10 minutes of an offering, 15 minutes of announcements, 20 minutes of a lifestyle sermon, sing a song and go to the coffee shop – and we call that the power of the Gospel designed to save people and set them free – no this is designed to build a club we call church.

Now don’t get mad at me for saying the way it is – you may remember when you went excitedly to meetings where the presence and power of God was so real, now all that is real is the smell of coffee wafting in.

You may be a pastor or leader wondering why God has left – its because you let the idol in.

You may say well I still feel the presence of God in my church – I’m not talking about an emotional kick because the music is good I am talking about the manifest presence of God present and His power being displayed as people earnestly seek Him. (and forget about the coffee)

Did the Apostles, including Paul, plant churches – the short answer is no. When Paul talked about planting he was talking about the Word of God. Again there is NO scripture that talks about church planting. It is a term conjured up probably by the idol to recreate itself. There are a number of scriptures that can be used out of context to prove church planting should be pursued but in context they fail to convince.

This is not an exhaustive study to refute all the scriptures used to promote church planting so please do a study yourself and you will see it very plainly. (see below for scriptural examples used in a church planting manual – note how these can only be interpreted as plating church scriptures if you already have that mindset – they don’t actually indicate church planting rather the spreading of the Gospel.)

You may say well churches were planted and visited by Paul and the other Apostles, elders were set in place, letters written to the churches etc etc.

The truth is that the ‘result of’ Paul and others preaching the Gospel with signs and wonders was that people were saved and delivered. They began to assemble together to encourage one another, break bread, to teach the word etc from house to house, in the temple at the riverside etc. Their motivation was to see the Kingdom established on Earth, not build churches. It wasn’t even in their thinking – their mindset was not to create an organization (Jesus never said I will build my organization) It was to see an organism called the Gospel flow into every corner of the world. As that happened the Apostles and leaders went and strengthened the assemblies.

Rev. Sam Pascoe’s short version of the history of Christianity goes like this:
Christianity started in Palestine as a fellowship;
it moved to Greece and became a philosophy;
it moved to Italy and became an institution;
it moved to Europe and became a culture;
it came to America (the west) and became an enterprise.

Churchianty is not Christianity – churchianity is all about the church, Christianity is all about Christ.

I can define either by one statement – who gets the glory of what is done – the Church or Christ. Who is promoted the church or Christ.
_____________________________________________
Taken from a church planting manual.

Why plant churches

JESUS TOLD US TO DO IT.
Matt. 28:19,20. “Go therefore and make disciples....baptising them...teaching
them to observe all things I have commanded....”

We cannot effectively make disciples and teach them the commands of Christ
outside a church setting.


An evangelistic campaign declares the gospel. It brings people to a place of
decision but it doesn't fully teach them all the things that Jesus commanded
us. This can only be done in a church setting.

When properly understood we see that the Great Commission is specifically a
commission about Church Planting.


2. THE EARLY CHURCH SET THE PRECEDENT.
Throughout the book of Acts, we see that whenever the disciples went about
fulfilling the Great Commission, they planted churches.

Illustrations
i) Acts 8:5-12 Philip plants a church in Samaria.
ii) Acts 9:1-2,19 Believers had planted a church in Damascus.
iii) Acts 9:31 By now there were churches throughout all Judea, Galilee and
Samaria.
iv) Acts 9:32-35 A church was planted in Lydda.
v)Acts 10:24-48 Peter established a Gentile church in Caesarea.
vi) Acts 11:19-26 The persecuted believers planted churches in Phoenicia,
Cyprus and Antioch.
vii) Acts 13:2 - 14:28 Paul's first missionary journey - the biggest single
church planting venture up to that point.
viii) Acts 15:40 - 18:23 Paul's second missionary journey - all to do with
church planting and strengthening existing churches.
ix) Acts 18:24 - 21:25 Paul's third missionary journey - again he planted new
churches and strengthened established ones
.

I would have to say that you can poke huge holes in this whole presupposition

I would love to hear about your comments.

Part 6 – Is ‘church’ planting scriptural

Before we get to this teaching:-

I have been discussing an idol called the church. Sometimes I feel I am like a flea trying to bring down an Elephant. That the idol is too big, it has been around for centuries and who am I to tackle it. I am encouraged by those that are doing likewise and those who are seeing the idol for what it is and seeking to get from under its deceptive power and alas I am saddened by some of my ‘friends in ministry’ that have vehemently opposed me and actively sided with the idol they serve.

I could have used the term ‘an idol called religion’ and few would have objected because they don’t consider themselves ‘religious’– the religious ones are of course ‘everyone else’. (Religious in the negative sense of the word). I could have used the term ‘an idol called Catholicism’ and everyone outside the Catholic church* would say Amen.

*It was in fact the Catholic church that first began using the word ‘church’ for a Christian gathering place or Christian organization. The Catholic bible was written in Latin and is where we find the word ‘church’ used in context to a Christian meeting place. This is why we cant find the equivalent word for ‘church’  in the Greek as it was a term adopted into the Latin catholic bible. Incidentally the reformers, including Luther, were opposed basically to the organizational structure and error of the institution called the ‘church’.

But because the term ‘an idol called the church’ hits at the very roots of what we have been taught to believe, it becomes personal. Because it is personal we can’t fob it off onto someone else, we then have to deal with it ourselves. How we deal with it determines what happens in our lives. The choices are clear.

1/ dismiss it without even seeking God as to its truth

2/ seek God about it, pray and study the word.

3/ change

Many have said the term communicates what they have been feeling. Many others have expressed the term in different ways over the years, even as I am learning more, over hundreds of years.

Some are having difficulty understanding the concept because of the old ingrained mindset which continues to cloud the truth.

I need to stress some points, again.

1/ I am not against the body of Christ which is commonly called ‘the church’ – I love the body of Christ and want to serve wherever I can.

2/ I am not against the body of Christ assembling together to worship God in buildings. I love being part of corporate gatherings of worshipers.

3/  But I am against this idol that masquerades as ‘the Church’ – it looks like ‘the church’ but it isn’t. It is very deceptive; it makes people believe in it in so many ways. People vehemently protect it. Many don’t have a true relationship with God because of it. It is treated and acts in the place of God in so many ways. (I have mentioned some and will be continuing revealing more aspects of this idol as time goes by)

I believe one of the most subtle deceptions the idol uses to protect itself is the word ‘church’ itself. I have taught where we got the word from, its original meaning and the correct use of the Greek word Ekklesia (that it doesn’t mean church, never has).

Some statements that may help.‘go’‘have’‘attend’‘in’‘out’‘belong’ We don’t to church. We don’t church. We don’t church. We are not church or of church. We don’t to a church.

We ‘ARE’‘ARE’ the church. (old terminology) - We the assembly of the firstborn.

I have suggested that because of the history and the meaning of the word church, because of the error it represents and the confusion it brings that we simply stop using the word.

While it seems to be a very simple suggestion it has been met with different reactions like “you are just word playing” or “does it really matter what we call it” or even spiritualized comments like “the Lord knows what I mean when I say church”. What these comments actually do is dismiss the whole revelation about the idol instead of engaging it.

What do people mean when they say things like “I love Jesus and I am still going to go to church like I always have done”. Well they are actually dismissing the Love of Jesus from delivering them from the power of the idol. When people don’t want to change they pre-empt their statements with things like “I love Jesus” or “Jesus knows my heart” or “Jesus knows what I mean”.

Is ‘church’ planting scriptural

Is church planting in the Bible? Have you ever researched this without a church planting mindset? Did Jesus say “go and plant churches”? We have attributed the Apostle Paul as the greatest ‘church planter’ – did he actually plant churches? If not what did he actually do? We attribute the gift of Apostle to church planting. Did the Apostles plant churches? If our mindset of church planting is incorrect what do we do to get back to the commission of Jesus?

I have planted numerous churches over around 30 years of ministry, I have trained people to plant churches, I have been involved in a senior leadership role of a church planting movement. When the Lord spoke to me and said “Church planting isn’t in the Bible” I was shocked but then soon realized there are actually no scriptures that talk about church planting.

The great commission is to “go into all the world and make disciples” – not plant churches.

Matt 28:19-20, Mark 16:15-18, Matt 10: etc

There is NO command, NO scripture where Jesus said to go plant churches rather go preach the gospel in the power of the Holy Spirit. It is the body of Christ’s commission to proclaim the gospel and make disciples. As we do this He said I will build my assembly.

It is very simple, if we plant churches the emphasis is on the church. If we proclaim the gospel the emphasis is all about Jesus and people.

If the emphasis is planting a church its all about how we go about this – what musicians do we have, what leaders do we need, what Sunday school class is needed, the building, the advertising, the signs etc. We put an advert in the paper or door knock to let everyone know a new church is in town. What sort of ‘programs’ will we use to attract people. How are we going to be ‘relevant’ to our community? There are many, many programs available from the ‘church’ that successfully used a program that ‘grew’ their church.

We attend church growth seminars, seminars on how to break through to the next level (of the membership role), we do everything we can and strive to get our church filled with bums on seats. We get to 500 members and now we can attend the 500 club to learn how to get to the next level. Church planting in the west is all about the organization, the success of numbers, how well we perform and the achievement of ‘building a church’.

Conversely Jesus said go preach about the Kingdom (not preach how to get a better lifestyle) – make disciples – I will give you power to heal the sick, cast out demon’s – I will validate what you says by signs following. In scripture, the result of this is that those that got saved assembled together for prayer, worship and fellowship. The intent was for people to be saved and delivered from bondage not sign up for church membership.

Have a church planting mindset - the emphasis is on the church.

Have a gospel mindset – the emphasis on people.

You say well the church helps people in lots of ways – yes, so do hundreds of other humanistic organizations helping people in their need while Jesus delivers people out of their bondage.

I am coming from a ‘Pentecostal’ standpoint here (I got saved in a Pentecostal assembly and have ministered mostly in that stream) – let me ask you when was the last time you saw someone delivered from demons in ‘church’. When was the last time you saw a miracle, healing, sign or wonder done in ‘church’. When was the last time you saw someone truly repent and get converted in ‘church’ (not just say a little prayer).

The answer for many, sadly, is many years ago. Why, because the idol has infiltrated the Pentecostal assemblies and shut the power of the gospel down. It has become more about the idol than the gospel of Jesus.

For most churches the program goes like this – 3 fast songs, 3 slow songs, 10 minutes of an offering, 15 minutes of announcements, 20 minutes of a lifestyle sermon, sing a song and go to the coffee shop – and we call that the power of the Gospel designed to save people and set them free – no this is designed to build a club we call church.

Now don’t get mad at me for saying the way it is – you may remember when you went excitedly to meetings where the presence and power of God was so real, now all that is real is the smell of coffee wafting in.

You may be a pastor or leader wondering why God has left – its because you let the idol in.

You may say well I still feel the presence of God in my church – I’m not talking about an emotional kick because the music is good I am talking about the manifest presence of God present and His power being displayed as people earnestly seek Him. (and forget about the coffee)

Did the Apostles, including Paul, plant churches – the short answer is no. When Paul talked about planting he was talking about the Word of God. Again there is NO scripture that talks about church planting. It is a term conjured up probably by the idol to recreate itself. There are a number of scriptures that can be used out of context to prove church planting should be pursued but in context they fail to convince.

This is not an exhaustive study to refute all the scriptures used to promote church planting so please do a study yourself and you will see it very plainly. (see below for scriptural examples used in a church planting manual – note how these can only be interpreted as plating church scriptures if you already have that mindset – they don’t actually indicate church planting rather the spreading of the Gospel.)

You may say well churches were planted and visited by Paul and the other Apostles, elders were set in place, letters written to the churches etc etc.

The truth is that the ‘result of’ Paul and others preaching the Gospel with signs and wonders was that people were saved and delivered. They began to assemble together to encourage one another, break bread, to teach the word etc from house to house, in the temple at the riverside etc. Their motivation was to see the Kingdom established on Earth, not build churches. It wasn’t even in their thinking – their mindset was not to create an organization (Jesus never said I will build my organization) It was to see an organism called the Gospel flow into every corner of the world. As that happened the Apostles and leaders went and strengthened the assemblies.

Rev. Sam Pascoe’s short version of the history of Christianity goes like this:

Christianity started in Palestine as a fellowship;
it moved to Greece and became a philosophy;
it moved to Italy and became an institution;
it moved to Europe and became a culture;
it came to America (the west) and became an enterprise.

Churchianty is not Christianity – churchianity is all about the church, Christianity is all about Christ.

I can define either by one statement – who gets the glory of what is done – the Church or Christ. Who is promoted the church or Christ.

_____________________________________________
Taken from a church planting manual.

Why plant churches

JESUS TOLD US TO DO IT.

Matt. 28:19,20. “Go therefore and make disciples....baptising them...teaching

them to observe all things I have commanded....”

We cannot effectively make disciples and teach them the commands of Christ

outside a church setting.

An evangelistic campaign declares the gospel. It brings people to a place of

decision but it doesn't fully teach them all the things that Jesus commanded

us. This can only be done in a church setting.

When properly understood we see that the Great Commission is specifically a

commission about Church Planting.

2. THE EARLY CHURCH SET THE PRECEDENT.

Throughout the book of Acts, we see that whenever the disciples went about

fulfilling the Great Commission, they planted churches.

Illustrations

i) Acts 8:5-12 Philip plants a church in Samaria.

ii) Acts 9:1-2,19 Believers had planted a church in Damascus.

iii) Acts 9:31 By now there were churches throughout all Judea, Galilee and

Samaria.

iv) Acts 9:32-35 A church was planted in Lydda.

v)Acts 10:24-48 Peter established a Gentile church in Caesarea.

vi) Acts 11:19-26 The persecuted believers planted churches in Phoenicia,

Cyprus and Antioch.

vii) Acts 13:2 - 14:28 Paul's first missionary journey - the biggest single

church planting venture up to that point.

viii) Acts 15:40 - 18:23 Paul's second missionary journey - all to do with

church planting and strengthening existing churches.

ix) Acts 18:24 - 21:25 Paul's third missionary journey - again he planted new

churches and strengthened established ones.

I would have to say that you can poke huge holes in this whole presupposition

I would love to hear about your comments.

   

An idol called the 'church' part 5

Thank you again for your many comments, emails and phone calls affirming these articles and my stance against the idol. The articles have been reprinted by various ministries, placed on other websites etc which is great because it is getting the word out.

Many also affirm what I am saying by having the same revelation, some even years ago, but I think the revelation that what we are facing is an actual idol has put it all into context of what we have been seeing, hearing etc over the years.

Some dear people still don’t get it and are actually defending the idol. Not one has challenged the teaching with scripture / theology. They only object through the mindset they have on the subject. A ‘mind’ that is ‘set’ on a thing is called a stronghold. I pray all will come out of the shadow of this idol and see clearly.

It amazes me how we got into this mess in the first place – but then we are fighting a very deceptive enemy.

I pray that we all see scripture with eyes wide open and not read it with our Greek Philosophical glasses on. There are many instances in scripture where we need correct understanding. For a very, very simple example in point. Do you realize that there were not 3 wise men following the star going to visit Jesus. (the bible doesn’t actually say how many) That they didn’t see Jesus in a manger (He was probably around 2 years old when they visited Him in a house). Yet for whatever reason when we read this account in Matt 2 we see in our mind 3 wise men visiting Jesus as a baby in a manger.
I am only using this as a clear example of how we read things through a mindset, whether it be from a tradition mindset or a repetitive viewing of pictures when we were children of the 3 wise men and Jesus in the manger.

We see everything through a mindset or a way of thinking. The Bible actually calls a mindset a ‘stronghold’. Regarding the ekklesia we also see this through a mindset. For many it’s the mindset of the idol called the church. If we put these glasses on all we see is what the idol dictates.

Just to indicate one other point about our mind set – Is church planting in the Bible? Have you ever researched this without a church planting mindset? Did Jesus say “go and plant churches”? We have attributed the Apostle Paul as the greatest ‘church planter’ – did he actually plant churches? If not what did he actually do? We attribute the gift of Apostle to church planting. Did the Apostles plant churches? If our mindset of church planting is incorrect what do we do to get back to the commission of Jesus? (This will be another series of articles coming soon – I believe this will radically tie in all the answers many people have been asking me over the years of how do we get back to Christianity found in the book of Acts.)

In this study I am going to attempt to bring some answers to the problem of the idol called the church and to break strongholds, change mindsets and bring clarity.

I was going to leave the answers to the end of this series and once all the revelation had been laid out, but many have been asking for answers as they see the problem clearly or at least are starting to grasp it and want to start standing against this idol and implementing change.

The major problem is the mindset (stronghold) we have regarding the ‘church’.

When we say ‘church’ what do we mean?

The English word "church" has various meanings. Webster gives the following definitions for the word church.
1. a building for public Christian worship.
2. a religious service in such a building.
3. (sometimes cap.) a. the world body of Christian believers; Christendom. b. any major division of his body; a Christian denomination.
4. a Christian congregation.
5. organized religion as distinguished from the state.
6. (cap) a. The Christian before the reformation. b. the Roman Catholic Church.

So when we say church, what do we mean?
Do we mean a building?
Do we mean an organization?
Do we mean the body of Christ?

Or is there confusion between these descriptions as to what the church really is.

Again over the Christmas break I have heard people say things that just reinforce this confusion. Eg. “Years ago people went to the church for answers – now fewer people are seeking out the church”
“the church has lost its relevance – so we need to be more relevant by updating our church programs”
“bring them to church to get saved”
“my life was a mess before I started going to church – the church has turned my life around”

All of these statements (to mention only a few) reflect confusion at best and heresy at worst. To answer briefly.

People should seek Jesus, not the church.

How can the body of Christ, full of the power of the Holy Spirit be irrelevant?

How can the church save lives? How can the church change lives? Isn’t it Jesus that does that?

ANSWERS TO DEFEAT THE IDOL.
Some would say we need to wage war and pray against this idol. This may be so and I encourage you to actively seek God first about this and pray what He says. I do believe we need to pray against the idol but we also have to put ‘feet to our prayer’ and do something about it.

2Co 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

I believe we need to re-educate ourselves and if we are leaders to re-educate those we teach. A mindset is started by incorrect teaching. It can be reversed by correct teaching (the truth shall set you free) A stronghold is used by an idol through the mindsets of people. Change the mindset and you take the stronghold away from the idol.

I have already shown in previous articles that the translation of the Greek word ‘ekklesia’ to the English word ‘church’ is incorrect.

To recap briefly.

An Ekklesia is not a building. (so why do we keep calling a building or organization a church)

Nowhere in the Bible is the PLACE where Christians meet referred to as a "church", nowhere.

Never does ekklesia refer to a BUILDING in which people gathered, for worship or for any other purpose, Never.

Ekklesia is not a physical place - it is an assembly of people.


I have also shown that the root word for church is not birthed in scripture but out of non Christian origin.

Some might say I now understand that we shouldn’t call a building or organization ekklesia or church but the body of Christ is the Ekklesia or church so why cant we use the term church to describe the body of Christ?

Today the word church has a wide variety of meanings from referring to a building to performing a religious service.

Unfortunately, when we hear the word ‘church’ our mind often paints a picture through those glasses filled with unbiblical characteristics. I believe it is time that Christians proclaim and reclaim a truly biblical concept of Ekklesia. Scripture confirms over and over again that an Ekklesia is the assembly of those who are called out of sin and called to Christ. Many of our modern concepts of ‘church’ are simply not found in Scripture and some even oppose Scripture.

The English dictionary reveals that the English word "church" which is used in our English Bibles is taken from the late Greek word "kyridakon" not "ekklesia." The Greek word "kyridakon" is not found in the New Testament and only came into being in the 16th Century long after New Testament times. Thus the English word "church" cannot be translated back into Greek because there is no word in the New Testament Greek that is the equivalent of the understanding of the English word.

Because there is so much confusion with the term ‘church’ I believe we should

1/ Remove the word ‘church’ from our vocabulary. When we do this we will see the change in our understanding of what we really mean when talking about ‘church’. Try and see how difficult it is to stop calling church, church. Everything is about church, so when we stop using the word we have to carefully choose another word to mean exactly what we mean. When "ekklesia" is translated correctly "assembly": "the assembly of God" or "the assembly of Christ." or even congregation as some ancient versions do and used in our conversation it begins to change many things that were associated with the idol called church. Ekklesia is all about the body of Christ, the people not the building or organization. We don’t go to church – we ‘assemble’ as the body of Christ whether it is in a special purpose building or on the beach. “Where two or three are gathered together in my name there I AM” Matt 18:20
Instead of saying “where do you go to church” you could say “where are you going to assemble”.

2/ Stop calling the building or organization, ‘church’. It is a ‘building’ and should be named such to avoid the continued confusion. We should stop calling the building a church, sanctuary, or the house of God (more teaching on this later) I suggest calling the building a centre, hall, assembly hall, fellowship hall. Eg stop saying things like “I am going to church”. The scriptural alternative is something like  “I am going to assemble with other Christians to worship God meeting at such and such Christian Centre". (this is Ekklesia) So you could replace with something like I am going to the centre, the assembly hall or the fellowship hall. It takes the emphasis off the idol and onto the body because it is just a hall.

3/ Stop using statements such as "welcome to church today", "welcome to the house of God", "we need to build the church" or "I love being in church" and anything that refers to the building or organization as being the ekklesia. They are incorrect.

3/ Stop teaching incorrect theology. Examples:- bring people to church to be saved, the church is the most powerful force on earth etc. Church changed my life. House of God theology including ‘sons of the house’ etc (more on this erroneous teaching bringing people into bondage to the idol later)

4/ Start teaching correct theology – Examples:- Jesus is the only one that can save people from their sin and transform their life and the body of Christ full of the power of the Holy Spirit has all the relevancy needed to preach the Gospel to every creature.

Teach how the body of Christ can rise up, how each member has a part, a function (not just in services) but in serving Christ and each other. It seems we have been confusing services with serving.
Start training the body and releasing them to do the work of the ministry God has called them to do. Eph 4:11-12

5/ Stop using bibles that translate ekklessia incorrectly.
The first printed English translation of the Bible (Tyndale’s Translation circa 1526) accurately translated the Greek word Ekklesia as ‘congregation’ or ‘assembly’. However, most modern translations of the Bible translate Ekklesia as ‘church.’ This is done out of out of convenience to the readers since ‘church’ is the common cultural word used for an assembly of believers. However, this does not mean it is an accurate translation of Ekklesia.

William Tyndale's translation did not translate the word "ekklesia" as church. Tyndale's translation correctly used the term "congregation." Tyndale completed the translation of the New Testament and part of the Old Testament before he was martyred. John Rogers, an assistant and friend of William Tyndale, completed the translation of the Old Testament using some work from Coverdale and published the first entire Tyndale Bible under the pen name "Thomas Matthew." This Bible was called the Matthew's Bible (1537) and also used the term "congregation." The next English Bible, the Great Bible (1539), also used the term "congregation." However, in 1557 the Geneva New Testament, produced by William Whittingham, was the first to translate "ekklesia" as "church”.
The word "church" was first used by Theodore Beza in 1556, a Protestant, who followed John Calvin at Geneva, Switzerland. As a Presbyterian, Beza believed in the idea of a catholic church and its hierarchal form of government and therefore chose to support this false concept by using the word "church" instead of "assembly." The reason is obvious in that the use of the word "congregation" or "assembly" would not support his church's hierarchical form of church government. William Whittingham's Testament of 1557 followed Beza's usage of "church" and was actually the first edition of the Geneva Bible and was a revision of the Tyndale New Testament.

Because the Geneva Bible was printed in Europe and not in England the English people desired a Bible published in their native country. This was the reason for the next English Bible, the Bishops Bible (1568) which was a revision of the Geneva Bible and this translation continued the use of the term "church" as has majority of subsequent English translations including the King James Version. This shows that the use of the word "church" instead of "assembly" or "congregation" came from those who had a bias towards a hierarchical and unscriptural form of church government. To have translated the word "ekklesia" accurately into "assembly" or congregation" would have exposed their form of church government as being in error.

I suggest using older translations like, Darby or Youngs or younger translations like ‘The Source’ (which was translated by a Greek scholar rather than a theologian or denomination and was taken from the actual meanings of the Greek words rather than from the use of those words in previous versions of the bible)

To be continued.

An interesting time line of the bible can be seen here.

http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/

 

An idol called the ‘church’ Part 4

Before I continue with part 4 of ‘An idol called the church’ I would like to make two points.

1/ Incorrect use of study material causes confusion.

One pastor commented on Part 3 of “an Idol called the Church”.

"You are saying that the Greek word ekklesia does not mean church, and is miss-translated. The Strong's reference (1577) to the word church uses both words: assembly and church. This reference is saying they are both the same."

“I have trusted the Strong's Concordance for many years, but here you are saying it is incorrect? Maybe you should take your Greek translation issues up with them as many pastors rely on its accuracy."


My answer:- May I humbly suggest rather, that those that use Strong's, use it correctly. The instructions on how to use Strong's (in the front of printed versions) say that the text before the :- is the meaning of the word. Text after the :- is how the King James Version translated it. (not what the word means).

So where it says :- Assembly, Church - this is stating just what the KJV uses, not the meaning

2/ Dismissing truth brings bondage

I can’t believe the amount of people including leaders emailing me that dismiss things because it just doesn’t fit their box. They have coloured glasses that they will not take off to see anything different. They dismiss things with a ‘but’. Statements like ‘what you say is true but ....’ I agree with what you say but .....’ They then justify why they are continuing in their error.

This is very dangerous because it is agreeing with and then dismissing a truth. It is dangerous because knowing the truth sets you free. Dismissing it brings bondage. It is like for example someone saying “I agree that the bible says adultery is wrong but people are only human and they really
love each other” they dismiss the truth and go into bondage.

When people say things like “I agree with what you say ekklesia means but we will continue to  do ‘church’ our way because we love Jesus” - this is playing right into the hands of the idol.

It seems like people totally agree with this teaching or they vehemently oppose it.

I have had meetings cancelled in a way that is very un-Christlike to the opposite side of the coin - new invitations coming in ‘because of’ the teaching. From rude emails from so called ‘Christians’ to groups of ministries asking permission to re-print the articles.  I am amazed at the hornet’s nest that this has stirred up. Pastors condemning what I am saying, Leaders of movements telling others not to have anything to do with me and yet so many other pastors, leaders and others giving great endorsement and encouragement to me.

From my experience so far those that vehemently oppose this have the most to lose, have their own agenda or are simply misquoting what is being said.

I have said for years that revival is coming but it’s not through a church or an organization or a person even – it is a body revival where the body of Christ rises up in revival to go and continue to do in the world what Christ started to do in the world.

Where the body of Christ is unshackled from religious systems that offer no life because that life is sapped by the idol. People are going to be revived to relationship instead religion and this will be fostered by personal connection to the Vine instead of programs designed to keep people busy.

My advice to leaders – hold loosely what you have. The idol will bind you to property instead of people. Position instead of calling. Serve the Lord and His body, not the idol.

I know scores of pastors that are shackled to their system by church buildings where their denomination control them by owning the building or has some other control. I know some that have wrestled for years because they would lose possessions or position that finally said “I let go”. One pastor recently turned up on my doorstep and said how fulfilled he was now by being out of the bondage he was in for years. He said “I baptised 16 people last week  - I have never baptised that amount of people before – we have more people turning up and they are excited about Jesus”. He was genuinely free from the burdens he carried for years being shackled to the idol.

I am not saying we shouldn’t, as Christians, assemble together as a body in a building or a place – what I am saying is:-

Part 4 ‘An idol called the church’.

A Church is not a building. (so why do we keep calling a building or organization a church)

Nowhere in the Bible is the PLACE where Christians meet referred to as a "church", nowhere.

Never does ekklesia refer to a BUILDING in which people gathered, for worship or for any other purpose, Never.

The ‘church’ building (or place of worship) is so connected with the idea of church that we unconsciously equate the two. (Frank Viola)

The idol called the church (where people worship the church rather than Christ) is actually rooted in ancient temple worship (this is still practised by most other religions on earth today)

Temple worship actually goes back to Judaism where that religion was centred on three things – the temple, the priesthood and the sacrifice. When Jesus came He ended all three.

Christianity started off as the only religion on the planet that had no sacred objects, sacred people and no sacred places – they had no sacred buildings for their worship.

Ekklesia is not a physical place it is an assembly of people.

In the New Testament it primarily refers to the spiritual Body of Christ on the earth. "And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints [holy ones] for the work of service, to the building up of THE BODY OF CHRIST; until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the true knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ" (Ephesians 4:11-13).

The Body of Christ is the true assembly of believers - the habitation of God as was the temple in the Old Testament.

Maybe we get our mindset of the church (building / organization) being the central part of our Western Christianity from the Old Testament where the temple was a dwelling place of God – but this is done away with in the New Testament.

If you don’t believe me when I say “the church (building / organization) being the central part of our Western Christianity” – try not ‘going to church’ for a while to see how you are labelled (backslidden, off track, not really functioning in the body come to mind – even rebellious)

The writer of Hebrews, in chapter 9, describes the Old Testament temple; its appearance and the activities of the Levite priests (vs. 1-8). He then compares it to the temple of Christ as follows:

" But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things to come, He entered through the greater and more perfect tabernacle [or sacred tent] not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building (Hebrews 9:11).

Acts 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

A building is not the habitation of God anymore.

The true assembly of believers of God is not of this world but is a spiritual dwelling place for God.

In the Old Testament both the temple in the wilderness and Solomon's temple were filled with the Spirit of God, to the extent that the priests could not even stand to minister. In the Old Testament God actually dwelled in the temples made by men.

In the New Testament, under the new covenant instituted by Christ, God no longer will dwell in a physical temple. His house will be within His believers. We of the Body of Christ are His dwelling place forever.

Paul never refers to the church as a physical structure but as a dedicated group of disciples; a new race redeemed by the blood of Christ (Mounce's Expository Dictionary).

"And coming to Him as to a living stone which has been rejected by men, but is choice [chosen, elect] and precious in the sight of God, you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices

All sources agree that ‘church’ denotes not a physical structure but a living, eternal spiritual dwelling place. The Body is one but has various expressions and gifts given to each individual member, all for the purpose of the building up of the Body (see 1 Corinthians 12). Christ is the head of His body and the remainder of His true spiritual Body is filled with the elect ones, the Saints, the chosen including those who have gone on. The gifts of the Spirit are given to each member as the Lord sees fit. People don't "join" the Body as they do in a modern day church; they are placed there by the Lord.

Paul said:
"So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints [holy ones] and are of God's household,

having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone, in whom the whole building, being fitted together, is growing into a holy temple [sanctuary] in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit" (Ephesians 2:20-22).

So the church building is no longer inhabited by God – it is not the house of God anymore, it is not sacred. But the body of Christ is now being built up as a dwelling place of God, the body of Christ is now the temple, and individuals are of the household of God.

Now, here is the clincher

2 Corinthians 6:16 What agreement has a temple of God with idols? For you are a temple of the living God. Even as God said, "I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they will be my people."

What agreement has a temple of God with idols? None. Repent and turn away from idols, repent and turn away from the idol called the church to Christ.

I am not saying turn away from assembling together as the assembly of believers in Christ but I am saying turn away from the idol called the church.

The glory doesn’t reside anymore in the building or organization.

Where God’s glory resides (from the temple -> Christ -> body of Christ).

Attributed most often to Rev. Sam Pascoe. It is a short version of the history of Christianity, and it goes like this: Christianity started in Palestine as a fellowship; it moved to Greece and became a philosophy; it moved to Italy and became an institution; it moved to Europe and became a culture; it came to America (the west) and became an enterprise.

Next time:- The assembly of believers is an organism not an organization. A body not a business. An entity not an enterprise.
An idol called the ‘church’ Part 3
   

Page 1 of 12

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest teaching articles "An idol called the church" & news

Subscribe Here

Latest Comments

  • Yes many are coming to the same conclusions that God is up to something. More...
  • God is awesome aye! More...
  • Hi Thanks for the encouragement More...
  • Bro (as the good ol kiwi would say), God is using you amazingly powerfully to bring revelation and liberty to His people. I have been in a struggle wi... More...
  • Thanks Ian for these articles which have so confirmed the journey we've been on here in mid-wales. The process from empire building to kingdom bringin... More...